Recent CEC Study on Exports of Used Electronics from North America
NCER participated in the final phase of research with MIT for a study recently published by the NAFTA Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) on the transboundary and domestic flows of used electronics in North America.
The full CEC press release is available at:
Read the study here:
Looking Back and Planning Forward: Progress Under State Laws and the Challenge of the Changing E-Scrap Pile
Tuesday, September 20 / 1:00 – 4:00 pm
Free for ERCC Members / $75 for non-ERCC Members / Registration required
This workshop, hosted by the Electronics Recycling Coordination Clearinghouse (ERCC), will discuss the latest successes and challenges under the implementation of the 25 state electronics recycling laws (and now DC). Workshop participants will hear about the latest updates to the laws from this year, such as those in Minnesota, and discuss what lessons can be drawn from them. The workshop will also address how these programs will need to adapt to the changing mix of product types that are expected in the recycling stream over the next several years. ERCC welcomes all participants to attend in order to bring their observations to this lively discussion.
U.S. consumers are estimated to have purchased more than 1 billion devices in 2015 with over 3.8 billion devices in use or storied in households.
Every year, new electronic cycles increase, leaving both a large amount of consumer electronics needing to be recycled and an exciting opportunity to enable electronic material reuse and materials recovery. Reuse, refurbishment, and recycling activities capture the value of the devices and their components, protect human health and the environment by executing responsible used device management, and conserve the resources embedded in the devices so they are available tomorrow for new uses. Continue reading “New Release! The Electronics Recycling Landscape Report”
The Electronics Recycling Coordination Clearinghouse (ERCC) has released the first study comparing state-level consumer awareness levels of electronics recycling programs as well as other important consumer preferences. Previous surveys of consumer awareness on electronics recycling have focused on a nationwide rate or on a single state. ERCC undertook the surveys in order to establish an additional measure of performance for electronics recycling programs, and to compare rates of awareness of electronics recycling options among states as well as ask other important questions. After developing a survey script with 10 standard questions on awareness, collection preference, barriers to recycling and other topics, ERCC surveyed member states who stepped forward to fund their survey costs, as well as other member and non-member states made possible by affiliate member contributions.
In all, ERCC surveyed 6 states WITHOUT electronics recycling laws and 6 states WITH electronics recycling laws at varying levels of confidence. To carry out the surveys, ERCC contracted with Service 800, a company with 20 years of experience in the design and execution of customer satisfaction measurement surveys.
A list of the states participating in the survey were as follows:
- New York
The consumer awareness surveys accumulated information on the following key topic areas:
- Consumers’ knowledge of electronics recycling opportunities
- How consumers handle electronics at end of life
- Barriers to recycling used/unwanted electronics
- Consumers’ knowledge of landfill bans
To read the Consumer Awareness Survey summary report in its entirety, you can find it HERE. For more information on ERCC, please see www.ecycleclearinghouse.org
The ERCC held a workshop at E-Scrap 2015 in Orlando, FL on Tuesday, September 1st.
This workshop, hosted by the Electronics Recycling Coordination Clearinghouse (ERCC), discussed recent trends of increasing calls for modifications to legislated state electronics recycling programs. Many state programs are holding stakeholder discussions and contemplating legislative changes to address challenges in implementation. Workshop attendees heard from a panel of manufacturers about their views on what is working and where programs should head. They also worked in small groups to develop constructive next steps and a common understanding of the issues.
The agenda was as follows:
1:00 – 1:15 PM – Introductions and Overview
ERCC Background; Summary and results of 2014 workshop; Goals for the workshop
1:15 – 2:15 PM – Q&A Session with Manufacturers: What’s Working/What’s Not with State Laws? What is the preferred role for the manufacturer?
2:15 – 2:45 PM – Small Group Sessions. Reactions to manufacturer suggestions and survey questions; What challenges are faced by other stakeholders?; What are potential solutions to the overlapping challenges?
2:45 – 3:00 PM – Break
3:00 – 3:30 PM – Report from Small Groups – Any ideas from more than one group overlap? How feasible are they?
3:30 – 4:00 PM – Areas of Agreement/ Potential ERCC Action
Notes from Workshop:
- State Targets
- Manufacturer Enforcement
- Verification of recycling costs
- Sales Data (state vs. national vs. 3rd party data)
- Communications Channels can be cumbersome
- Definitions: Manufacturers and States working together. Set unified calendars. Product scope uniformity.
- Sales Data: set up a dispute resolution regime.
- Verification: Create templates for downstream verifications.
- Industry needs to unify and become clear unifying leader in efforts, followed by states.
- Map out which states have more flexibility to make changes vs. those who require legislative fixes.
Executive Director, Jason Linnell, will be speaking on a moderated panel on Tuesday, December 8th at the 2015 U.S. Product Stewardship Forum in Boston, MA. The panel features industry experts on management of paint, electronics and thermostats.
Topics discussed will be as follows:
- How did these programs begin?
- How did the pioneers gain and maintain momentum around these issues?
- How do we evaluate program performance?
- What lessons learned can apply to other emerging programs?
- What challenges did these programs face; how were they overcome?
For more information about the Forum, visit the PSI website.